Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schatzle v. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of State of Missouri, et al., 1982 — 456 U.S. 966 · caselaw · US
General
Schatzle v. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of State of Missouri, et al.
456 U.S. 966·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 81-1731.
Schatzle v. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of State of Missouri, et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Mo.
[CONCURRENCE — Justice Rehnquist,]
Justice Rehnquist,
concurring.
Appellant in this case requests that we overrule Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U. S. 526 (1969). But here the District Court did not invalidate a reapportionment plan duly adopted by the state legislature; it merely adopted a plan of its own when the legislature was unable to reach agreement. This case, therefore, does not require that we address appellant’s suggestion respecting Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, supra.