Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles W. Terrett, Respondent, v. The New York and Brooklyn Steam Saw-mill and Lumber Company, Appellant, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Charles W. Terrett, Respondent, v. The New York and Brooklyn Steam Saw-mill and Lumber Company, Appellant
49 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles W. Terrett, Respondent, v. The New York and Brooklyn Steam Saw-mill and Lumber Company, Appellant.
(Submitted April 19, 1872;
decided April 23, 1872.)
This is an action of ejectment. Both parties claimed under a common source of title. Defendant’s deed was the prior one, and bounded the land conveyed on one side “ by the southeasterly line or side” of what was formerly known as First avenue, in the city of Brooklyn. This avenue had never been opened as a public highway, and had been discontinued by act of the legislature. The conveyance contained this clause, also, “ together with all the right and title of the grantor in and to one-half of the streets and avenues by which said lots are bounded.” There was no other avenue referred to in the description of the granted premises, and the grantor had title ■■thereto. Held, that defendant’s deed carried the title to the center of the avenue.
Edgar M. Cullen for the appellant.
Puf us L. Scott for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Allen, J.,]
Allen, J.,
reads opinion for reversal and new trial. All concur.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.