General
Walter A. MAY et al., Appellants, v. D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellee
32 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter A. MAY et al., Appellants, v. D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
January 9, 1929.
Rehearing Denied June 24, 1929.
No. 3811.
Sachs & Caplan and Charles H. Sachs, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.
John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Wm. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., and John A. McCann, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (C. M. Charest and Ottamar Hamele, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.