General
Philip Schuyler, Respondent, v. Ernest Curtis et al., Appellants
148 N.Y. 754·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Philip Schuyler, Respondent, v. Ernest Curtis et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 17, 1896;
decided February 25, 1896.)
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 147 N. Y. 434.)
Charles M. Demond for motion.
James B. Ludlow opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Granted and remittitur amended so as to make it award costs in all courts; no costs of this motion.