Contracts · MBE-tested
Palmer et al., Trustees, v. Palmer et al., Trustees
305 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Mr. Justice Brandéis took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 325.
Palmer et al., Trustees, v. Palmer et al., Trustees.
Decided January 9, 1939.
Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Talcott M. Banks, Jr. for petitioners.
Messrs. James Garfield and Hermon J. Wells for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted, limited to the first question presented by the petition. The decree of the Circuit Court Appeals is reversed in that particular and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in case No. 63, Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. v. Palmer, ante, p. 493.
Mr. Justice Brandéis took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.