Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Holland Trust Company, Respondent, v. James A. Waddell, Appellant, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 666 · caselaw · US
General
The Holland Trust Company, Respondent, v. James A. Waddell, Appellant
151 N.Y. 666·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Holland Trust Company, Respondent, v. James A. Waddell, Appellant.
Holland Trust Qo. v. Waddell, 75 Hun, 104, affirmed.
(Argued January 25, 1897;
decided February 9, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 20, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Burton N. Harrison for appellant.
George H. Yeaman, John E. Roosevell and George C. Kobbé for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, on opinion below, with costs.
All concur.