General
Sweetney v. Johnston, Warden
314 U.S. 607·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 216.
Sweetney v. Johnston, Warden.
October 13, 1941.
Clarence Mackel Sweetney, pro se. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, denied.