Admiralty
Webber et al. v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., et al.; and Maritime Food Corp. v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., et al.
375 U.S. 880·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 463.
No. 499.
Webber et al. v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., et al.; and Maritime Food Corp. v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., et al.
Arthur Abarbanel for petitioners in No. 463. David I. .Gilchrist for petitioner in No. 499. Julius L. Goldstein for Turner & Blanchard, Inc., James F. Dunn and Morton Zuckerman for the Government of Pakistan, and Clement C. Rinehart for Caltex (India) Ltd., respondents. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 322 F. 2d 249.