Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank Burger, Appellant, v. The Snare and Triest Company, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Frank Burger, Appellant, v. The Snare and Triest Company, Respondent
186 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Burger, Appellant, v. The Snare and Triest Company, Respondent.
Burger v. Snare & Triest Co., 105 App. Div. 636, affirmed.
(Argued December 3, 1906;
decided December 21, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 27, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover for- personal injuries alleged to have been received through defendant’s negligence.
J. Newton Piero and Amasa J. Parker for appellant.
PLeetor M. Hitchings for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Haight and Vann, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch., J., Edward T. Bartlett and Willard Bartlett, JJ.