Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James R. F. Kelly et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent, 1904 — 180 N.Y. 507 · caselaw · US
Corporations
James R. F. Kelly et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent
180 N.Y. 507·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James R. F. Kelly et al., Appellants, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Kelly v. City of New York, 87 App. Div. 299, affirmed.
(Argued November 17, 1904;
decided December 6, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment, entered November 19, 1903, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, overruling plaintiffs’ exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by°the Appellate Division, and directing a dismissal of the complaint.
Louis Marshall for appellants.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Yarn, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.