Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Andrew J. Lawson, Appellant and Respondent, v. Julius Lincoln et al., Respondents and Appellants, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Andrew J. Lawson, Appellant and Respondent, v. Julius Lincoln et al., Respondents and Appellants
178 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew J. Lawson, Appellant and Respondent, v. Julius Lincoln et al., Respondents and Appellants.
Lawson v. Lincoln, 86 App. Div. 217, affirmed.
(Argued May 19, 1904;
decided June 3, 1904.)
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered August 11,1903, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
Benjamin 8. Deem for plaintiff, appellant and respondent.
F. E. Woodbury and Eleazer Green for defendants, respondents and appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, O’Brien, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.