Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James J. Belden, Respondent, v. Stevenson Burke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 760 · caselaw · US
General
James J. Belden, Respondent, v. Stevenson Burke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
148 N.Y. 760·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James J. Belden, Respondent, v. Stevenson Burke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Submitted March 2, 1896;
decided March 10, 1896.)
Motion for re-settlement. (See 147 N. Y. 542.)
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and remittitur amended by adding after the word “affirmed” the words,-“on the ground that the plaintiff had actual notice of all the facts complained of.”