Contracts · MBE-tested
DUDDLESTON et al. v. GRILLS et al.
385 U.S. 455·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DUDDLESTON et al. v. GRILLS et al.
No. 370.
Decided January 9, 1967.
Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney for appellants.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees Branigin et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, ante, p. 440, Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U. S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.