General
Kirkpatrick v. Hardt
303 U.S. 626·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 857.
Kirkpatrick v. Hardt.
Decided March 28, 1938.
Mr. James Martin Kirkpatrick, pro se. No appearance for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.