Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nate GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1934 — 69 F.2d 1005 · caselaw · US
General
Nate GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
69 F.2d 1005·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nate GOLDBERG et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7037.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 21, 1934.
Hugh M. Wilkinson and Edwin H. Grace, both of New Orleans, La., for appellants.
Rene A. Viosea, U. S. Atty., and William H. Norman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New Orleans, La., for the United States.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and HUTCH-ESON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BY THE COURT.]
BY THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for violations of the National Prohibition Act. Upon the authority of United States v. Chambers, 54 S. Ct. 434, 78> L. Ed. - — - (opinion filed February 5, 1934), the judgment is reversed and annulled.