Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Egan v. United States; and Union Electric Co. v. United States, 1943 — 320 U.S. 788 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Egan v. United States; and Union Electric Co. v. United States
320 U.S. 788·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 410.
No. 414.
Egan v. United States; and Union Electric Co. v. United States.
November 15, 1943.
Mr. Thomas Bond for petitioner in No. 410; and Mr. William L. Igoe for petitioner in No. 414. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and Homer Kripke, and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Reported below: 137 F. 2d 369.