Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alden W. Young, Respondent, v. Maurice Barry, as Chief Engineer of Subdivision 152 of the Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 532 · caselaw · US
General
Alden W. Young, Respondent, v. Maurice Barry, as Chief Engineer of Subdivision 152 of the Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellant
182 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alden W. Young, Respondent, v. Maurice Barry, as Chief Engineer of Subdivision 152 of the Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Appellant.
(Argued June 6, 1905;
decided October 3, 1905.)
Young v. Barry, 102 App. Div. 620, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 11, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
S. M. Coon for appellant.
F. T. Cahill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. *&., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ.