Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elmer E. Rowe, Respondent, v. Archibald S. White, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 523 · caselaw · US
General
Elmer E. Rowe, Respondent, v. Archibald S. White, Appellant
189 N.Y. 523·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elmer E. Rowe, Respondent, v. Archibald S. White, Appellant.
Bowe v. White, 113 App. Div. 688, affirmed.
(Argued June 3, 1907;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 9, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover certain moneys received by defendant as a dividend upon certain stock alleged to have been owned by plaintiff’s assignor at the time the dividend was declared.
R. Floyd O lárice for appellant.
Frank IF. Brown for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.