Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Abex Corp. et al. v. Trustees of the Property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al., 1969 — 394 U.S. 999 · caselaw · US
General
Abex Corp. et al. v. Trustees of the Property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
394 U.S. 999·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1142.
Abex Corp. et al. v. Trustees of the Property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.
JohnW. Barnett for petitioners Abex Corp. et al., and John F. Hunt, Jr., for petitioners Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al. James Wm. Moore, Joseph W. Bishop, Jr., Joseph Auer-bach, and Morris Raker for respondent Smith, Trustee; Albert X. Bader, Jr., for respondent Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., Trustee, Joseph Schreiber and Wilkie Bushby for respondent Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., Trustee, Lester C. Migdal and Lawrence W. Pollack for respondent New Haven Railroad 4% Bondholders Committee, and Myron S. Isaacs for respondent Oscar Gruss & Son.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.