Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 647 · caselaw · US
General
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents
172 N.Y. 647·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Johanna Kalish et al., as Executors of Joseph Kalish, Deceased, Appellants, v. Luke Higgins et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 70 App. Div. 192.
(Argued November 10, 1902;
decided November 18, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 8, 1902, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial.
The motion was made upon the ground that the only question involved was one of fact which is not reviewable by the Court of Appeals.
M. J. Horam, for motion.
Edwa/rd O. Orrell, Jr., opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.