Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The New York Life Insurance and Trust Company, as Trustee of Francis W. Lasak, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ophelia J. Cuthbert et al. and Antoinette Lucinda Schermerhorn, Appellant, and Mary A. Frost et al., as Executors of Calvin Frost, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 701 · caselaw · US
General
The New York Life Insurance and Trust Company, as Trustee of Francis W. Lasak, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ophelia J. Cuthbert et al. and Antoinette Lucinda Schermerhorn, Appellant, and Mary A. Frost et al., as Executors of Calvin Frost, Deceased, et al., Respondents
157 N.Y. 701·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The New York Life Insurance and Trust Company, as Trustee of Francis W. Lasak, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ophelia J. Cuthbert et al. and Antoinette Lucinda Schermerhorn, Appellant, and Mary A. Frost et al., as Executors of Calvin Frost, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 31 App. Div. 191.
(Submitted November 21, 1898;
decided November 29, 1898.)
Motion to prefer an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 16, 1898, modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the ground that one of the defendants died after the action was at issue and that the appeal was entitled to a preference under subdivision 4, section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
R. E. <& A. J. Prime for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied upon the authority of Colton v. Pf. Y. Elevated R. R. Co. (151 N. Y. 266), without costs.