General
Rose N. Hanrahan, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent
130 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rose N. Hanrahan, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued October 30, 1891;
decided December 1, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 23, 1889, which set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff, sustained defendant’s exceptions and directed a new trial.
Charles Strauss for appellant.
Samuel Blythe Rogers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order and for judgment absolute against the appellant; no opinion. .
All concur, except Follett, Ch. J., not sitting.
Ordered accordingly.