Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
I. B. LEVY, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. CIMARRON RIVER OIL CO. et al., 1928 — 24 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
I. B. LEVY, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. CIMARRON RIVER OIL CO. et al.
24 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
I. B. LEVY, Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. CIMARRON RIVER OIL CO. et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 27, 1928.
No. 7254.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.
W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart, R. R. Bell, and E. P. Ledbetter, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellants.
B. B. Blakeney and Hubert Ambruster, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., and John
J. Shea and Thomas F. Shea, both of Tulsa, Okl., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed on motion of certain appellees without costs to either party in this court.