General
Eliza T. Brush, Respondent, v. George W. Batten, Sheriff, etc., Appellant
134 N.Y. 617·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eliza T. Brush, Respondent, v. George W. Batten, Sheriff, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 16, 1892;
decided October 1, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 14, 1888, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff, which affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Ercmk Brundage for appellant.
E. M. Ashley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting, and Parker, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.