Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jew Sing v. Barber, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1955 — 350 U.S. 898 · caselaw · US
General
Jew Sing v. Barber, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
350 U.S. 898·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 21, 1955.
No. 18.
Jew Sing v. Barber, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari,
348 U. S. 910, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot.