Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Squire v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co.
342 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Mr. Justice Éeed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice' Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton concur, adhering to the views expressed in Dicev. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359,364.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 3, 1952.
No. 189.
Squire v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co.
Melvin L. Griffith and Francis H. Monek for petitioner.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Dice v. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359.
Mr. Justice Éeed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice' Jackson, and Mr. Justice Burton concur, adhering to the views expressed in Dicev. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359,364.