Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Staake, Trustee, Petitioner, v. Watts, Robertson & Robertson et al., 1905 — 198 U.S. 587 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Staake, Trustee, Petitioner, v. Watts, Robertson & Robertson et al.
198 U.S. 587·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 656 and 657.
William H. Staake, Trustee, Petitioner, v. Watts, Robertson & Robertson et al.
May 29, 1905.
Mr. H. Gordon McCouch and Mr. Samuel W. Cooper for petitioner.
Mr. S. Hamilton Graves for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.