General
Thomas A. Mills, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant
151 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas A. Mills, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.
Mills v. Brooklyn Oily R. R. Go., 10 Miso. Rep. 1, affirmed.
(Argued October 27, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from a judgment of tlie General Term of the City-Court of Brooklyn, entered October 24, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
P. S. Dudley and Thomas S. Moore for appellant.
J. Stewart Ross for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin and Vann, JJ.; not voting, Andrews, Ch. J., and Haight, J.; not sitting, Gray, J.