Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comfort Co., et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 808 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comfort Co., et al.
355 U.S. 808·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 146.
United States v. McNinch, doing business as Home Comfort Co., et al.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter and William W. Ross for the United States. Edward W. Mullins for McNinch et al., and A. C. Epps and Charles W. Laughlin for Cato Bros., Inc., et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.