General
William Gamble, Respondent, v. Nicholas Cuneo, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
162 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Gamble, Respondent, v. Nicholas Cuneo, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Gamble v. Cunea, 21 App. Div. 413, affirmed.
(Argued March. 16, 1900;
decided April 3, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 8, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term, añd granting a new trial.
Frederick H. Man and Henry H. Man for appellant.
Franklin Pierce for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for plaintiff on the stipulation for $5,415.50, with interest from April 6, 1897, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.