Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DAKOTA LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. MIDLAND NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendant in Error, 1928 — 28 F.2d 1009 · caselaw · US
General
DAKOTA LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. MIDLAND NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendant in Error
28 F.2d 1009·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DAKOTA LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. MIDLAND NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
August 8, 1928.
No. 7505.
John B. Hauten, of Watertown, S. D., and R. G. O’Malley, Linus O’Malley, and Frank T. O’Malley, all of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
A. Ueland and Sigurd Ueland, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Former judgment, entered April 12, 1927 (18 F.(2d) 903), vacated and set aside, and, in accordance with mandate of the Supreme Court (48 S. Ct. 532, 72 L. Ed. -), judgment of District Court affirmed, with costs, etc.