General
Ernest St. George Lough et al., Appellants, v. E. Emilius Outerbridge et al., Respondents
144 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ernest St. George Lough et al., Appellants, v. E. Emilius Outerbridge et al., Respondents.
(Submitted November 26, 1894;
decided December 4, 1894.)
Motion for re-argument.
Treadwell Oleveland for motion.
Sutler, SUllmam, & Hubbard opposed.
Case reported, 143 N. Y. 271.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Motion granted.