General
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abraham KIRSCH, Defendant in Error
16 F.2d 204·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abraham KIRSCH, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 6, 1926.)
No. 89.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Writ of error to an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, vacating a search warrant and directing a return of certain papers seized.
Emory R.' Buckner and John M. Harlan, both of New York City, for the United States;
Leo H. Klugherz and Leonard A. Snitkin, both of New York City, for defendant in error.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case was argued as a companion to United States v. Kirschenblatt (C. C. A.) 16 F.(2d) 202, and involves the same point. In view of the disposition of that ease, there is no occasion for any discussion of this.
Order affirmed.