General
D. O. MENASCO, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. G. HAWKINS, Defendant in Error
4 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1925
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
D. O. MENASCO, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. G. HAWKINS, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 24, 1925.)
No. 4476.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, Edwin R: Holmes, Judge.
Geo. J. Leftwich, of Aberdeen, Miss. (Leftwich & Tubb and Geo. J. Leftwich, all of Aberdeen, Miss., and C. H. King and A. B. Galloway, both of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for plaintiff in error. Geo. T. Mitchell and Chas. S. Mitchell, both of Tupelo, Miss., and L. M. Smith, of Memphis, Tenn., for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This was an action by the plaintiff in error for alleged malicious prosecution. Nothing is presented for review, except rulings of the court on objections to evidence. We think that each of those rulings obviously is either so free from error or nonprejudicial that no more need be said than that none of them involved reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.