Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re WEINSTOCK. Ex parte IRVING TRUST CO., 1932 — 56 F.2d 829 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re WEINSTOCK. Ex parte IRVING TRUST CO.
56 F.2d 829·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re WEINSTOCK. Ex parte IRVING TRUST CO.
No. 284.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 7, 1932.
James H. Levinson, of New York City, for appellant.
Samuel Sturtz, of New York City, for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CURIAM.]
PEE CURIAM.
This is an appeal without leave from an order upon a petition of a trustee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt, summarily directing him to turn over a sum of money received by him, and alleged to be part of the bankrupt estate. As such it is a bankruptcy proceeding under section 24b, Bankr. Act (11 USCA § 47 (b), and not a controversy in bankruptcy under section 24a of the act (11 USCA § 47 (a). In re Shidlovsky, 224 F. 450 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (C. C. A. 2) (semble); Kirsner v. Taliaferro, 202 F. 51, (C. C. A. 4). There is no jurisdiction without leave to appeal granted within thirty days. In re The Torgovnick, 49 F.(2d) 211 (C. C. A. 2).
The appeal is dismissed.