Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Sidney C. Brown, C. M. Pearson and H. O. Plasman, Appellants, v. J. GORDON, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Sidney C. Brown, C. M. Pearson and H. O. Plasman, Appellants, v. J. GORDON, Appellee
63 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Sidney C. Brown, C. M. Pearson and H. O. Plasman, Appellants, v. J. GORDON, Appellee.
No. 6236.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 20, 1933.
W. P. Hughes, U. S. Atty., of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants.
M. H. Rosenhouse, of Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The memorandum opinion filed herein on April 14, 1932 (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 1086, is hereby recalled; and, on the authority of United States v. Commercial Credit Co., 286 U. S. 63, 52 S. Ct. 467, 76 L. Ed. 978, the judgment of the district court is reversed.