General
Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries of Alabama, et al.
315 U.S. 786·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 28.
Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson, Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries of Alabama, et al.
[MAJORITY]
The opinion of February 2, 1942, ante, p. 148, is amended as follows:
On page 4, line 5, strike out the words “comes under” and substitute therefor the words “is subject to.”
On page 14, line 15, strike out the word “watches” and substitute therefor the words “has authority to watch.” On page 15, line 7, strike out the word “subjected” and substitute therefor the word “subject.”
On page 15, lines 7 and 8, strike out the word “continuous.”
Respondents’ petition for rehearing is denied.
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 148.