Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Zoeller, Appellant, v. Julia A. Riley, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 668 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Frederick Zoeller, Appellant, v. Julia A. Riley, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent
98 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Zoeller, Appellant, v. Julia A. Riley, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent.
(Argued March 8, 1885;
decided March 24, 1885.)
This was a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the amount in controversy was not $500.
The action was for conversion. The complaint alleged that the property was worth $500. Plaintiff’s evidence on the trial was to the effect that the value was $300.
The court here say :
“ This action is not founded upon contract, and hence the sum for which the complaint demands judgment is deemed to be the amount of the matter in controversy within the meaning of section 191 of the Code. Here the complaint demands judgment for $500. It matters not that proof given upon the trial shows that the plaintiff’s damages were less. If he can succeed upon his appeal upon a new trial, it will be open to him to show that this property was worth $500, or more, if he can.”
Thomas E. Pea/rsall for motion.
J. D. Bell opposed.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads mem. for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.