Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re BASTANCHURY CORPORATION, Limited. BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST & SAVINGS ASS'N v. Ashby TURNER, 1932 — 62 F.2d 543 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In re BASTANCHURY CORPORATION, Limited. BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST & SAVINGS ASS'N v. Ashby TURNER
62 F.2d 543·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Before WILBUB and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges and CAYANAH, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re BASTANCHURY CORPORATION, Limited. BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST & SAVINGS ASS’N v. Ashby TURNER.
No. 6940.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 1932.
Cruiekshank, Brooke & Evans and I. Blair Evans, all of Pasadena, Cal., and Newlin & Ashbum and Gurney E. Newlin, all of Los Angeles, Cal. (Lloyd W. Brooke, of Pasadena, Cal., and Allen W. Ashburn, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.
Kyle Z. Grainger, Walter J. Little, and M. L. Babbitt, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Carl C. Cowles, of Santa Ana, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUB and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges and CAYANAH, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.]
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
On the authority of In the Matter of Bastanchury Corporation, Limited, No. 6939, 62 F.(2d) 537, decided by this court this day, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, and the order of the District Court denying the appellant’s petition for review and affirming the referee’s order re restraining order is reversed, and the restraining order is hereby vacated.
Motion denied, and order reversed.