Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edmund A. VARELA (Carrie B. WALSH, Intervener), Appellants, v. J. Franklin BELL, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, as Commissioners of the District of Columbia and as Members of the Zoning Commission, et al., Appellees, 1926 — 10 F.2d 989 · caselaw · US
General
Edmund A. VARELA (Carrie B. WALSH, Intervener), Appellants, v. J. Franklin BELL, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, as Commissioners of the District of Columbia and as Members of the Zoning Commission, et al., Appellees
10 F.2d 989·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1926
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and YAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edmund A. VARELA (Carrie B. WALSH, Intervener), Appellants, v. J. Franklin BELL, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, as Commissioners of the District of Columbia and as Members of the Zoning Commission, et al., Appellees.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted December 9, 1925.
Decided January 4, 1926.)
No. 4343.
W. J. Lambert and R. H. Yeatman, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
R. G. Donaldson, Hayden Johnson, Y. E. West, C. L. Frailey, F. H. Stephens, and J. C. Wilkes, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees. ■
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and YAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.]
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, by way of intervention, filed a bill for injunction, praying the same relief as that sought by the plaintiffs in the case of Larrabee et al. v. Bell et al., 10 F.(2d) 986, — App. D. C. —, No. 4270, this day decided. For the reasons expressed in the opinion therein, the decree in this case is affirmed, with costs.