Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MADISON COUNTY AND ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK, v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, et al., 2014 — 134 S. Ct. 1582 · caselaw · US
General
MADISON COUNTY AND ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK, v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, et al.
134 S. Ct. 1582188 L. Ed. 2d 589·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MADISON COUNTY AND ONEIDA COUNTY, NEW YORK,
v.
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 12-604 (R46-011).
Supreme Court of the United States
March 26, 2014.
Case below, 2d Cir., 665 F.3d 408.
The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.