Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hannah L. Andrews, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v. Harvey K. Partridge, Trustee, etc., 1912 — 225 U.S. 699 · caselaw · US
General
Hannah L. Andrews, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v. Harvey K. Partridge, Trustee, etc.
225 U.S. 699·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 907.
Hannah L. Andrews, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v. Harvey K. Partridge, Trustee, etc.
April 8, 1912.
Mr. Thomas E. French and Mr. Samuel H. Richards for the petitioner. Mr. Henry F. Stockwell and Mr. John D. McMullih for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted, and ordered that transcript on file herein stand as the return to the writ of certiorari.