Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James G. ELLINGBURG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. G. LUCAS, Correctional Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Respondent-Appellee, 1975 — 518 F.2d 1196 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
James G. ELLINGBURG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. G. LUCAS, Correctional Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Respondent-Appellee
518 F.2d 1196·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1975
Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James G. ELLINGBURG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. G. LUCAS, Correctional Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 75-1012.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted June 9, 1975.
Decided June 25, 1975.
James G. Ellingburg, pro se.
Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen., and Robert A. Newcomb, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., for respondent-appellee.
Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff, an Arkansas state prisoner, appeals from the dismissal of an action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 brought against a prison employee. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged the defendant defamed his reputation by calling him an obscene name. We affirm.
Damages for defamation are not recoverable under § 1983 because a defamed person has not been deprived of any right, privilege or immunity secured to him by the Federal Constitution or laws of the United States. See Morey v. Independent School Dist., 429 F.2d 428 (8th Cir. 1970), affirming, 312 F.Supp. 1257, 1262 (D.Minn.1969); Azar v. Conley, 456 F.2d 1382, 1388-1389 (6th Cir. 1972); Heller v. Roberts, 386 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1967).
Judgment is affirmed.