Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moritz Gluck, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Ridgewood Ice Company, Appellant, 1891 — 125 N.Y. 728 · caselaw · US
General
Moritz Gluck, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Ridgewood Ice Company, Appellant
125 N.Y. 728·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moritz Gluck, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Ridgewood Ice Company, Appellant.
(Argued January 19, 1891;
decided February 3, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 28, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Samuel JD. Morris for appellant.
Charles Steelder for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.