Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Wilhelmina Buchholz et al., Respondents, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
177 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wilhelmina Buchholz et al., Respondents, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
Buchhol/z v. JY. Y., L. E. & W. B. B. Oo., 71 App. Div. 452, affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1903;
decided January 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 20, 1902, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Henry Bacon and Joseph Merritt for appellant.
Frank Lybolt and John W. Dyon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin and Werner, JJ. Absent: Haight, J. Not sitting: Yann, J.