Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant, v. Tonawanda Board and Paper Company, Respondent, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 563 · caselaw · US
General
St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant, v. Tonawanda Board and Paper Company, Respondent
186 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant, v. Tonawanda Board and Paper Company, Respondent.
St. Regis Paper Co. v. Tonawanda Board & Paper Co., 107 App. Div. 90, affirmed.
(Argued October 16, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 22, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial, and granted a new trial in an action to recover a sum alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered.
i
Henry Purcell for appellant.
Lewis T. Payne for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Haight, Yann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Absent: Gray, J. Not sitting: Hiscock, J.