Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James White, Respondent, v. James D. Rankin, Appellant. Elmira E. Christian, as Executrix of Hans S. Christian, Deceased, Respondent, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 622 · caselaw · US
General
James White, Respondent, v. James D. Rankin, Appellant. Elmira E. Christian, as Executrix of Hans S. Christian, Deceased, Respondent
162 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James White, Respondent, v. James D. Rankin, Appellant. Elmira E. Christian, as Executrix of Hans S. Christian, Deceased, Respondent.
White v. Rankin, 18 App. Div. 293, affirmed.
(Submitted March 6, 1900;
decided March 27, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme' Court -in the second judicial department, entered respectively June 19 and June 18,1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
George F. Alexander for appellant.
Hector M. Hitchings and George V. Brower for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.