Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Federal Security Administrator and the Attorney General of the United States, 1949 — 336 U.S. 971 · caselaw · US
Securities
In re Federal Security Administrator and the Attorney General of the United States
336 U.S. 971·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 597, Misc.
In re Federal Security Administrator and the Attorney General of the United States.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioners. Charles S. Rhyne for intervenor.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file petition for writs of prohibition and/or mandamus is granted. A rule is ordered to issue, returnable on Monday, May 16th, requiring the respondents to show cause why the petition for writs of prohibition and/or mandamus should not be granted and the cause is assigned for argument on that day. The motion of Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. for leave to intervene is granted.