Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Leo WEINBERG, Bankrupt; Leo WEINBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William T. DAVIS, Appellee, 1930 — 42 F.2d 219 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Leo WEINBERG, Bankrupt; Leo WEINBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William T. DAVIS, Appellee
42 F.2d 219·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Leo WEINBERG, Bankrupt. Leo WEINBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William T. DAVIS, Appellee.
No. 367.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 2, 1930.
Helfat & Corkland, of New York City (J. Nathan Helfat and Isaac Corkland, both of New York City, of counsel), for objecting creditor.
Samuel L. Miller, of New York City (Jesse Menzer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order [42 F.(2d) 218] affirmed.