Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OHIO MUNICIPAL JUDGES ASSN. et al. v. DAVIS et al., 1973 — 411 U.S. 144 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
OHIO MUNICIPAL JUDGES ASSN. et al. v. DAVIS et al.
411 U.S. 14436 L. Ed. 2d 113·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OHIO MUNICIPAL JUDGES ASSN. et al. v. DAVIS et al.
No. 72-1010.
Decided March 26, 1973
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
On the ground that it was beyond its authority to grant the primary relief sought, the United States District Court dismissed appellants’ suit which alleged that Art. IV, § 6 (B), of the Ohio Constitution denied equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The judgment is affirmed, but on the ground that appellants’ constitutional challenge to Art. IV, § 6 (B), was without merit.
So ordered.